A Short Guide to Writing a Great Dissertation Literature Review
Submitting a literature review with grammar errors, wrong structure, and formatting often results in examiners returning the document for revisions. In such a case, you might end up not submitting it on time, which means you won’t graduate with your classmates. Besides, if the reviewing process is done is a shoddy manner, an examiner will check out the methodology, discussion, and conclusion in detail to be sure they are also not of poor quality. They do that with the notion that if the review section is flawed, then the other chapters might also be substandard.
Given the importance of this document for both masters and even doctoral students, it is essential that all chapters, including a literature review, meet the grading criteria and expectations of that discipline. To avoid handing in a poorly conceptualized literature review, use this guideline.
Understand the Purpose
The aims of conducting a literature review are to allow scholars to prove that they know who the researchers in that field are and appreciate their work. In scientific courses reviewing numerous literature is all about showcasing exceptional writing abilities and demonstrating your understanding of concepts in the area.
A well-written literature analysis proves the scholar is knowledgeable about that subject. Hence key variables, vocabularies, theories, and methods must be incorporated.
Other valid reasons for conducting a literature review include:
- Identifying gaps from other researcher’s work and in that field.
- Seeking evidence for arguments or views stated. This enhances the credibility of your document.
- Gaining insight on crucial variables related to the topic. This, in turn, allows the scholar to grasp a new perspective.
- Separating areas that have already been extensively covered and those that need to be focused more on.
- Showcasing the relationship between ideas and practices as well as providing suggestions for further research.
H2: Elements to Incorporate
A high-quality literature review will have five key characteristics: goal, perspective, organization, focus, coverage, and information that meets the standards of the target audience.
The literature review focus has to be on relevant theories, research methods, and their application. If you look at various literature reviews, you will notice that most focus on research findings. The outcomes are analyzed, summarized, and a conclusion drawn from all that. This often is used to justify an outcome study by showcasing the lack of information in certain research results.
Other literature reviews focus on research methods, whereby they identify the strengths and weaknesses of the methodology and key variables. What’s common about all reviews is that the goals often center on critically analyzing research from other authors. They also identify key issues or analyzing the literature to find its weakness and propose a remedy. In such a case, the writer’s perspective is to present facts or discuss preexisting biases that might have affected the review.
On the other hand, coverage determines how much relevant literature to analyze to avoid covering too much, which often exceeds the word count and takes a lot of time. Instead of analyzing every piece of research, set a specific number, and conduct exhaustive reviews on them.